Intelligent Discussion of News, Politics and Current Events
You are not logged in.
Has anyone seen his press conference? The degree to which this man appears to be a whore to his own ambition is striking.
Wright explained the differences between his statements and BHO's by asserting that BHO is a politician and has to say what a politician says, whereas he (Wright) answers to another authority.
I don't like BHO or Wright, but Wright's public buddy-fuck shocked me.
Question: Since this public separation has served them both well, is it reasonable to see this as choreographed?
Online
To answer your last question:
Sure does, doesn't it? Didja catch BO's response to Wright's statements? Thought these guys were friends, Wright was a mentor, a member of the family, etc etc. BO pretty much called him a bitch to the media.
Offline
I too was just considering how Wright has suddenly realized his own potential as a national fire brand within the black community. Another Sharkson (sounds better than Jackton
). His open comment that he'd go after Obama too if the man is elected because he'd represent a government that "grinds over people" confirmed it IMO.
I don't think the idea that this growing public fight between the two of them is contrived is all that far-fetched, but I'm not convinced of it yet either. It's an awfully risky strategy. Occam's Razor says that this might be exactly what it looks like; Wright seeking to carve out a power niche for himself (as he receives increased national and international shows of support from people who agree with him), and Obama trying to save face and look like the moderate "healer" he's been portraying himself as. I think Wright's increasingly radical behavior puts Obama on the spot at a time that it doesn't exactly benefit him.
The press is trying to paint Wright's assertion that attacks on him are attacks on the black church as code to that church for "Help!". I don't agree. I think Wright is trying to draw them in, but he's relishing the attention as a national figure now. And the crazier he gets, the more attention he gets.
Last edited by Seabird (04-29-2008 10:46 PM)
Offline
Matt -
I think you give too much credit to people for planning.
As usual, my main problem with successful conspiracies is that they all seem to require a more advanced species.
I am also not bothered anywhere near as much by either Wright or Obama as other people seem to think that all "Right Thinking" Americans ought to be. Obama as President with Wright as Veep wouldn't be anywhere NEAR as bad for our country as having a Carpet Muncher in Chief. And no, I don't have a problem with Lesbians. I've got 20gigs of proof that I don't have a problem with Lesbians. I have a problem with THAT Lesbian.
All that aside...
I think we should be proud. We finally have a season of Political Comedy that exceeds even the antics of the French Parliament.
Last edited by MC Escher (04-29-2008 10:47 PM)
Offline
MC Escher wrote:
And no, I don't have a problem with Lesbians. I've got 20gigs of proof that I don't have a problem with Lesbians. I have a problem with THAT Lesbian.
![]()
All that aside...
I think we should be proud. We finally have a season of Political Comedy that exceeds even the antics of the French Parliament.
Yeah, but we're miles and miles apart from the antics of the Italian Parliament. Thank FSM.
Offline
Bitter IMO, that must be why he clings to Black Liberation Theology.
Offline
zukiphile wrote:
Question: Since this public separation has served them both well, is it reasonable to see this as choreographed?
Choreographed? By who? Wright is trying to sell his book. Obama is taking hits on all sides.
Remember there are two ways of being sorry:
Being sorry for what one did. Making a genuine act of penance.
Then we have being sorry for getting caught.
Last edited by Veritas (04-30-2008 12:07 AM)
Offline
I'm not that pissed about what Rev. Wright had to say, it's not like you have to dig too deep to find ideas and opinions like that within the black community. I'm just shocked that he'd do this at all. What a smug, arrogant, selfish piece of shit scumbag. I feel for Obama, actually. I don't buy the idea this was choreographed. This hurts Obama, maybe not as much as some are predicting but I see zero positives for him in this, no matter how much the media has his back. Wright's no idiot, he knows what he's doing up there and he knows the consequences. He's deliberately poking and prodding white America to get a rise. Throwing his rhetoric in their face knowing that if the roles were reversed, said white preacher would have been pilloried. All the while he sinks Obama's campaign further and further. I can understand him feeling slighted by Obama but to turn around and do this to him? Savaging Obama's image as a uniter, a man who will bring "new politics" to Washington free of partisanship & the usual bullshit, and America's "post-racial" candidate. Sure that image was going to be beat on once the general election race begins but to have someone who used to be such an important part of your life turn on you like that is brutal.
You wanna talk conspiracy theories? Maybe Farrakhan & Wright are collaborating (perhaps with Sharpton & Jackson too) to bring Obama's campaign down. After all, if Obama's the post-racial candidate that will lead us into the future, that dries up the grievance and victim market that these four clowns have cornered.
Last edited by devilether96 (04-30-2008 01:13 AM)
Offline
See, I'm looking at the opposite side: By Wright "calling out" Obama, he actually fortifies his position within the white America that got a bad taste from the previous association, thus propelling Obama back into the good graces of the enlightened masses.
For that matter, quid pro quo down the road within the administration, etc. is plausible.
Offline
devilether96 wrote:
I'm just shocked that he'd do this at all. What a smug, arrogant, selfish piece of shit scumbag. I feel for Obama, actually.
I had a similar reaction, and I'd bet we weren't the only two.
devilether96 wrote:
This hurts Obama, maybe not as much as some are predicting but I see zero positives for him in this,...
BHO has taken the opportunity to draw a contrast between he and Wright in a pretty plausible way-- he is the good cop to Wright's bad cop.
Online
And he has pissed off a lot(the majority) of African Americans with that move.
Offline
devilether,
You beat me to what I wanted to post.
From Wright's perspective as well as other race pimps, having a black POTUS, especially one who doesn't subscribe to their philosophy, has no real positives. It's harder to sell the U.S. as a hateful bastion of black-hatin' honkey bigots who pine for the days of Jim Crow and slavery when that same nation sees fit to vote a black man into office. Hell, even his having such a good shot at it should cast doubt for some on how "racist" America is. Yes there is racism - won't say there's not, but it is not remotely as severe and as widespread as people like Rev. Wright would have you believe.
I don't know how badly Senator Obama hurts himself with black voters by distancing himself from Rev. Wright. While I do not think of black voters as "of one mind" I do think that any black voter who would embrace the good reverend's theology may also prefer still voting for a black candidate than a white one. Even if she was the First Lady to the first black president.
He does help himself potentially with certain blocks of white voters - the ones Senator Clinton is questioning his ability to get out to vote in a general.
Offline
Turd_Ferguson wrote:
See, I'm looking at the opposite side: By Wright "calling out" Obama, he actually fortifies his position within the white America that got a bad taste from the previous association, thus propelling Obama back into the good graces of the enlightened masses.
For that matter, quid pro quo down the road within the administration, etc. is plausible.
I see what you're saying and to be honest I don't know how "the polls"are reacting to this whole thing or how they will in the fututre. But I think that the majority of the people that would react that way are already voting for Obama. Hillary supporters are going to use this as proof about Hillary being more electable in the general election. In the theoretical Hillary V. McCain polls, she's gaining ground and has passed him in some states. Obviously, take that for it's worth. It's opened more doors for Obama fall out of
Offline
I believe it was choreographed. They had no choice, IMO. Obama was becoming -defined- by Wright, and something like this was his only way to break that. I was rather expecting it, actually. And so was Wright, we have him on the record saying over a year ago that Obama would have to distance himself in order to get elected. I would be incredibly surprised if they didn't discuss this at length and orchestrate every word.
Qwinn
Offline
In this case, I heavily favor the idea that the simplest explanation is the most probable.
Obama 'attended' this church for almost 20 years. I say 'attended' because he most likely made regular donations, actually went to church once a month, and spent twice the amount of time advertising the fact he was a church goer. I doubt he was actually present for even 50% of the crap Wright has been spewing in all that time. I think this, because this whole angle of attack seems like something even a retarded campaign manager could have foreseen and prepared a defense for. It was a genuine surprise to his camp, because in truth, Obama wasn't a regular attendee.
To suggest any kind of conspiracy here would be a bit of a stretch I think. Wright was simply corrupted by his new found fame and the ability to reach a greater audience with his message. From here on out, these are all self motivated actions on his part.
Offline
Crash6 wrote:
Wright was simply corrupted by his new found fame and the ability to reach a greater audience with his message. From here on out, these are all self motivated actions on his part.
This is where I'm at currently. I still don't buy Obama's claims that he had no idea how radical Wright was. He had become too high profile for Wright not to have sought him out and spoken to him at some kind of length, or to have never heard about Wright's sermons from other parishioners over a 20 year period. Seriously, if he's that ignorant over that length of time over the kind of stuff coming out of his own church, then I question his capability to be President anyway.
Honestly, this is a hard thing to spin. Is he pandering to the religious element of his constituency by claiming to go to church when he didn't? Or is he lying about not having known about what kind of jackass Wright was and the kinds of things he was saying? Or did he both attend and know about the sermons and truly buys into the black liberation theology?
Am I missing a likely scenario?
Offline
He's not particularly religious and Wrights church was a means to political power, although he genuinely is correctly defined as a New Black Realist that rejects the old gaurd Black Civil Rights Political Power Structure and their victimization peddling/conpiracy theorizing/hate&fear mongering.
He didnt attend church much, but fully knew that Farrakhan and Wright were 2 peas in a pod. He even believes that Farrakhan and Wright have done much for the black community action wize, just that their tired rhetoric is not the way forward.
Offline
First thing I thought after reading OB's comments on Wright's press conference was that they added up to nothing more than damage control. He needed a stage to clearly illustrate that he does not condone Wright's preaching. Simply saying so wasn't working - he needed a specific situation in which he could appear a bit pissed off.
Considering how much white lefties love to forgive, I'm betting it will work splendidly.
Offline
Seabird wrote:
Honestly, this is a hard thing to spin. Is he pandering to the religious element of his constituency by claiming to go to church when he didn't? Or is he lying about not having known about what kind of jackass Wright was and the kinds of things he was saying? Or did he both attend and know about the sermons and truly buys into the black liberation theology?
Am I missing a likely scenario?
D) All of the above.
Online
EscapeVelocity wrote:
He didnt attend church much, but fully knew that Farrakhan and Wright were 2 peas in a pod. He even believes that Farrakhan and Wright have done much for the black community action wize, just that their tired rhetoric is not the way forward.
If that's correct then he should have just said so. It would have been a lot more logical and easier than all of this metaphorical tap dancing.
Offline
Seabird wrote:
...tap dancing.
racist
Online
zukiphile wrote:
Seabird wrote:
...tap dancing.
racist
I was actually waiting for that one. It was real hard not to type the word "minstrel" in there too. ![]()
Offline
For some reason, I just don't get that spun up over Rev. Wright -- I think BO's association with him was a marriage of political convenience, and I think BO is way too smart to adopt Wright's shtick as his own. For me, there's plenty of other reasons not to vote for him -- if we're keeping those reasons narrowly focused on associations & allies, Barry's & Michelle's links to William Ayers & his wife bother me a lot more than Rev. Wright.
Still, it's hard to argue with this:
Wright Out [Jonah Goldberg]
I agree entirely with Andy below. You know who made this a racial thing? Not Sean Hannity. Not Fox News. Not Hillary Clinton. Barrack Obama made Jeremiah Wright a race thing. It was his big "race speech" that transformed a singular black preacher into the living personification of the "Black Community."
And you know what really bugs me about it? For all the gobbledygook about Barack's race speech "finally" starting a conversation on race, the whole reason Obama made Wright into a racial issue was so that people would shut up. He tried to scare people away from an inconvenient discussion about race. He said to pay attention to Wright would be a distraction. It would divert people from what really matters. And by "what really matters" Obama meant "getting me elected." The press got Wright's message: Don't you dare criticize Wright for this is black dirty laundry and an attack on Wright is an attack on all of us.
The press dutifully carried this water for the Obama campaign, proclaiming any mention of Wright to be out of bounds or even racist until it blew up in their face this week (as I mention in my column today).
But there are at least two problems with this. First, it is complete nonsense that Jeremiah Wright speaks for the entire black community or the black church, whatever that is.
But, second and more important, if that were true then shame on the black church and the black community too. I am so sick of hearing talking heads saying that Wright's sermons are nothing unusual in black churches as if that somehow makes what he says ok. It's as if something disgusting and untrue is outrageous if one person believes it, but it's suddenly respectable if lots of people — or lots of black people — believe it. Hogwash.
(Funny how it's not a defense of evangelical Christians to say of Pat Robertson's blather "that sort of thing is said in white churches every Sunday.")
Oh and one last thing, I'm not someone who constantly carps about how we need yet one more conversation about race in this country. But the people who do say that sort of thing the most seem to be the same people who want the conversation about Jeremiah Wright and what he represents to go away. That is outrageously dishonest. Unless of course your real aim is to have the same old conversation about race again and again and again, in which the only villain is white America and the only victim is black America, and all of the old cliches get one more fresh coat of Wrightwash.
(emph. mine)
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/? … ZkYjdiY2M=
Online
Huck agrees:
Mike Huckabee wrote:
“Jeremiah Wright needs for Obama to lose so he can justify his anger, his hostile bitterness against the United States of America,”
“If it’s not true that a man, because of his color, is held back and can’t be president, then so much of what Jeremiah Wright has said is invalid,”
“His (Obama’s) campaign is not being derailed by his race, it’s being derailed by a person who doesn’t want him to prove that we have made great advances in this country,”
Once again - got it @Hotair
Offline
Kneecapped.
We as a nation will not be able to progress on racial issues until the Old Gaurd Black leadership perishes from this Earth.
The New Black Realism will then lead the way. Obama when he is not pandering and licking boots for political power, is a New Black Realist. His wife however....... ![]()
Last edited by EscapeVelocity (05-02-2008 01:08 AM)
Offline