I couldn't decide if this belonged here or in the Humor section

I think this is great:


I wish I could say that the worst thing about John Hickenlooper's CNN
town hall on Wednesday night was the part where he talked about
watching Deep Throat with his mom. The former governor of
Colorado, who is one of roughly 173 declared candidates for the
Democratic presidential nomination, explained that the porno-with-mom
thing was not an accident. He said he knew that the movie was "naughty"
but thought his mother might enjoy getting out of the house. Apparently
after the infamous X-rated flick began she was "mortified." That poor
woman.

Possibly even more cringe-inducing, though, was Hickenlooper's
response to a question about whether he would consider selecting a woman
as his running mate. "Of course," he told Dana Bash. Fair enough. What
else is there to say? But for some reason he felt compelled to go on.
"I'll ask you another question. How come we're not asking, more often,
the women, ‘Would you be willing to put a man on the ticket?'" Did you
hear that, Governor? That was the sound of a hundred thousand American
woman groaning simultaneously.

Why are Democrats so weird? Only a few days after his long-shot
candidacy had begun to attract some interest from the mainstream press,
Andrew Yang came out strongly against circumcision, surely one of the
most pressing political and social issues of our time. He even doubled
down on this by agreeing on Thursday to debate right-wing Wunderkind
Ben Shapiro on the subject. Last month Sen. Kamala Harris (Calif.) told
a painfully obvious lie about listening to Snoop Dogg and Tupac while
smoking weed in college (she graduated many years before either of them
released their debut albums). Even her own father told her to cut it
out. Sen. Elizabeth Warren's (Mass.) insistence on releasing the results
of a DNA test in the hope of vindicating her past claims of Native
American heritage was one of the most bizarre events in recent political
history.

Meanwhile, there is Beto. I don't particularly care that in 1988 the young Robert Francis O'Rourke posted
some erotic verses about cows ("Oh, Milky wonder, sing for us once
more, / Live your life, everlusting [sic] joy" is one of the only bits I
can quote on this family website) online. I didn't even know until
yesterday that there was such a thing as "online" in 1988. Nor am I
going to get all worked up about his weird murder spree fantasy story,
which is the kind of thing stupid teenagers write every day. But what I
do want to know is whether he actually took a handful of green feces,
put it in a bowl, and served it to his wife once, telling her that it
was avocado. Asked by a journalist recently to confirm the anecdote,
which had been reported by a supposed friend of the candidate, he
responded that while he didn't remember this happening it "sounds like
the kind of thing I would do." Come again? If you fed excrement to the
mother of your children, I feel like you would recall. I almost
certainly think she would. If there was ever something to lie about as a
politician, this is it.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that no one in this gang of
hardcore porno-with-mom-watching, pretend-weed-smoking, bovine-horny
ex-teenage hackers could ever be elected president. The guy they are all
running against is a twice-divorced serial philanderer and pathological
liar addicted to social media and fast food who once bragged about the
size of his genitalia during a formal debate. Maybe Democrats even think
that by embracing their inner weirdness they can channel some of
Trump's electoral magic. Or maybe they just think that the American
people can no longer be bothered to care about the sorts of things that
would have been career ending for any politician back in the remote past
— 2014 or so.

They're probably right about this. At this
early stage in the race, about 17 living Americans who are not either
journalists or residents of Colorado know who the guy with the Dr. Seuss
character name who legalized marijuana years ago even is. All of this
nonsense is just going to blend together until the powers that be in the
Democratic National Committee decide that some safe-ish,
middle-of-the-road liberal like Harris is the candidate who can beat
Bernie Sanders, at which point the junior senator from Vermont will
probably fall on his sword by endorsing North Korea's bid for the U.N.
Security Council or confessing that he doesn't know the words to the
Pledge of Allegiance.

I can't be the only person who sometimes thinks there's something to
be said for, you know, normal people in politics. It is certainly
difficult to imagine poor Jeb Bush ever inviting his late beloved mother
to view a smut film with at the local cinema in Kennebunkport. It is
even harder to imagine President Obama feeding the former first lady the
contents of one of Sasha or Malia's diapers.

The water is still warm, Hillary.

Comments

  • It’s because they live in a bubble and are oblivious to just how far around the bend they’ve gone.
  • MC Escher said:

    It’s because they live in a bubble and are oblivious to just how far around the bend they’ve gone.

    Said without a trace of irony or self-awareness from the safety of an internet safe space.
  • edited March 31
    vwtool said:

    ...safe space.


    A safe space is defined by the exclusion of upsetting people or material. You know that's not how this place operates. You can call this place clubby, or deride it in various ways, but lying through your teeth just shows that you're a scumbag.

    Was your latest deception spurred by your disappointment about how wrong you were about Mueller's report?  When was the last time you saw Ruth Ginsburg making a public appearance?
  • Slap said:

    ...A safe space is defined by the exclusion of upsetting people or material...




    In real life, yes. On the internet, absence of strict moderation means the worst/loudest elements drive away more civil participants. You may not have willfully crafted a safe-space, but your behavior has made it one.
  • vwtool said:


    Said without a trace of irony or self-awareness from the safety of an internet safe space.

    Case in point.
  • vwtool said:

    Slap said:

    ...A safe space is defined by the exclusion of upsetting people or material...




    In real life, yes. On the internet, absence of strict moderation means the worst/loudest elements drive away more civil participants. 
    Don't worry.  You won't drive us away.
  • vwtool said:

    On the internet, absence of strict moderation means the worst/loudest elements drive away more civil participants.


    Thank you for demonstrating that you're not a "more civil participant"; that you haven't been driven away; and that this isn't a safe space. It takes effort to be as wrong as consistently as you are, which indicates malice rather than stupidity.
Sign In or Register to comment.